Total Commodity Programs in Louisiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 15,298
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Louisiana totaled $157,172,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Double M Farms North | Rayville, LA 71269 | $211,229 |
82 | Little Creek Farms | Mangham, LA 71259 | $208,764 |
83 | James J Deshotel | Bunkie, LA 71322 | $202,383 |
84 | Uni Plantation | Belcher, LA 71004 | $200,625 |
85 | Advanced Agriculture Inc | Lafayette, LA 70598 | $199,944 |
86 | The Whaley Place LLC | Forest Hill, LA 71430 | $199,898 |
87 | Saxon Becnel & Sons LLC | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $188,858 |
88 | Costello Farming Partnership | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $188,378 |
89 | Sims Farms | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $188,286 |
90 | Yates Farms Partnership | Vidalia, LA 71373 | $188,199 |
91 | Shackelford Farms Ptn | Bonita, LA 71223 | $185,622 |
92 | Jack Rabbit Nursery LLC | Mcnary, LA 71433 | $185,131 |
93 | Mathews Brothers D/b/a Mathews Farms | Alexandria, LA 71303 | $184,684 |
94 | Tamarack Planting Co | Monroe, LA 71202 | $183,586 |
95 | Paul Miller & Sons | Deville, LA 71328 | $183,339 |
96 | Jordan Planting Co II | Rayville, LA 71269 | $181,803 |
97 | Lone Oak Ag | Morganza, LA 70759 | $181,264 |
98 | Haring Farms Planting Partnership | Wisner, LA 71378 | $177,573 |
99 | Seventy One Plantation Planting Co | Oscar, LA 70762 | $175,572 |
100 | Young Hollow Nursery Inc | Forest Hill, LA 71430 | $175,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”