Emergency Conservation Program in Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 3,796
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Louisiana totaled $47,001,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Raywood Stelly | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $53,784 |
142 | Blanchard Brothers Inc | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $53,564 |
143 | Sweethome LLC | Paulina, LA 70763 | $53,550 |
144 | Morgan Equipment Sales Inc | Amite, LA 70422 | $53,165 |
145 | G & G Cattle LLC | Lake Charles, LA 70607 | $53,163 |
146 | Terri Lynne Netherlin | Cloutierville, LA 71416 | $53,102 |
147 | Georgia A Constance | Sulphur, LA 70665 | $52,971 |
148 | Robert Scarborough | Natchez, LA 71456 | $52,535 |
149 | Smokey Cove LLC | Singer, LA 70660 | $52,354 |
150 | Ben & Ben Becnel, Incorporation | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $52,051 |
151 | Roman Theriot | Creole, LA 70632 | $51,780 |
152 | Whitlee Inc | River Ridge, LA 70123 | $51,635 |
153 | Tangi-wash Dairy Inc | Mount Hermon, LA 70450 | $51,512 |
154 | Jesse P Loupe | Lockport, LA 70374 | $51,151 |
155 | Thomas B Cocke Sr | Mount Hermon, LA 70450 | $51,140 |
156 | Brandon Lorio | Oscar, LA 70762 | $51,029 |
157 | Thomas H Hurdle | Rosedale, LA 70772 | $50,899 |
158 | Steve Thibodeaux | Houma, LA 70364 | $50,472 |
159 | Melvin Ray Branch | Angie, LA 70426 | $50,299 |
160 | Thomas L Hulsey | Amite, LA 70422 | $50,285 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”