Farm Subsidy information
Louisiana
Total Subsidies in Louisiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 12,841
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Louisiana totaled $307,867,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | William D Horton | Pitkin, LA 70656 | $196,894 |
142 | Robert Adams | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $196,591 |
143 | Ben & Ben Becnel, Incorporation | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $196,589 |
144 | Ann M Floyed | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $196,432 |
145 | Kimberly M Leblanc | Welsh, LA 70591 | $195,781 |
146 | Kent I Thibodeaux | Morse, LA 70559 | $193,404 |
147 | Katy Benoit Sonnier | Welsh, LA 70591 | $193,021 |
148 | Bayou State Farms LLC | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $192,986 |
149 | Mason P Theriot | Lake Arthur, LA 70549 | $191,879 |
150 | Leland Dale Vidrine Jr | Maurice, LA 70555 | $191,799 |
151 | Leonards Brothers Farm | Bell City, LA 70630 | $191,541 |
152 | Sims Farms | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $191,142 |
153 | Lee Farms Partnership | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $190,046 |
154 | Wesley Kirk Ford | Monterey, LA 71354 | $188,818 |
155 | David J Branch Jr | Rayville, LA 71269 | $188,591 |
156 | John Stone Farms LLC | Gilliam, LA 71029 | $187,481 |
157 | Rice Road Farms LLC | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $187,095 |
158 | D & B Farms General Partnership | Estherwood, LA 70534 | $186,216 |
159 | Barrett Hardee | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $186,180 |
160 | Big D Farms Of Luling LLC | Luling, LA 70070 | $185,303 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”