Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,598
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Louisiana totaled $35,914,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Erwin Farms Partnership | Jena, LA 71342 | $110,234 |
22 | Red Gum Planting Co No 2 | Ferriday, LA 71334 | $105,369 |
23 | Jordan Planting Co II | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $103,660 |
24 | Lee Farms Partnership | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $101,285 |
25 | Turner Bros Farms | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $100,787 |
26 | Four Oaks Farms | Morganza, LA 70759 | $99,329 |
27 | Sims Farms | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $95,209 |
28 | Mcdonald And Mcdonald | Newellton, LA 71357 | $94,701 |
29 | Marien Farms | Alexandria, LA 71303 | $94,330 |
30 | Bubenzer & Sons | Bunkie, LA 71322 | $93,479 |
31 | Jbf Partnership | Transylvania, LA 71286 | $92,483 |
32 | Barham Stevenson Co | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $92,408 |
33 | Rmw Farms | Shreveport, LA 71115 | $86,984 |
34 | Collins Ag Partnership | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $83,737 |
35 | Shariden Farms Partnership | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $81,247 |
36 | Parker Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $81,030 |
37 | Somerset Plantation | Newellton, LA 71357 | $80,898 |
38 | Marsh Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $80,878 |
39 | J & S Farms | Sterlington, LA 71280 | $80,246 |
40 | Patrick Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $80,245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”