Farm Subsidy information
Louisiana
Total Subsidies in Louisiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 19,342
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Louisiana totaled $532,842,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fruge Farm Ptrs | Branch, LA 70516 | $784,180 |
42 | Perritt Farms Partnership | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $783,879 |
43 | Thornton Farms | Transylvania, LA 71286 | $774,341 |
44 | Logan Farms Partnership | Gilliam, LA 71029 | $761,581 |
45 | Stutts Bros Farm Partnership | Bonita, LA 71223 | $743,053 |
46 | Vandeven Farms | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $733,526 |
47 | Ash More Farm Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $696,410 |
48 | Puckett Farms | Natchez, LA 71456 | $695,041 |
49 | Familia Farm Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $688,848 |
50 | Joseph Kent Farms LLC | Lottie, LA 70756 | $683,485 |
51 | G F & P Zaunbrecher Farm | Rayne, LA 70578 | $674,826 |
52 | Ross Planting Company | Pioneer, LA 71266 | $670,651 |
53 | Panola Farming Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $667,905 |
54 | Marien Farms | Alexandria, LA 71303 | $665,778 |
55 | Advanced Agriculture Inc | Lafayette, LA 70598 | $651,410 |
56 | North Boeuf Farms Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $647,380 |
57 | Paul Miller & Sons | Deville, LA 71328 | $643,719 |
58 | Mark And Charlynn Liuzza Farms Ll | Independence, LA 70443 | $636,904 |
59 | K & M Cane | Bunkie, LA 71322 | $629,141 |
60 | Little Creek Farms | Mangham, LA 71259 | $622,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”