Deficiency Payment in Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 17,560
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Louisiana totaled $146,490,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ed Wild & Sons Partnership | Welsh, LA 70591 | $296,824 |
22 | North Boeuf Farms Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $295,643 |
23 | Guidry Bros Farming Partnership | Oberlin, LA 70655 | $289,648 |
24 | 4 G Farms | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $283,598 |
25 | Strong Farms | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $281,419 |
26 | Davis Ledoux II & Sons Partnership | Basile, LA 70515 | $280,026 |
27 | Smith Farm Mgt | Oberlin, LA 70655 | $269,886 |
28 | Lost Ball Partnership | Sondheimer, LA 71276 | $264,824 |
29 | Loewer Brothers | Eunice, LA 70535 | $257,720 |
30 | A & B Partnership | Jones, LA 71250 | $250,721 |
31 | Zaunbrecher Cassedy Farm Partners | Jennings, LA 70546 | $248,396 |
32 | Costanza Brothers Partnership | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $247,640 |
33 | J & E Farm Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $244,157 |
34 | Sanders Planting Part | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $241,594 |
35 | Seventy One Farm Joint Venture | New Roads, LA 70760 | $234,552 |
36 | Sylvester Brothers | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $234,363 |
37 | Deshotels Farm Management | Lettsworth, LA 70753 | $233,027 |
38 | D & M Farms | Plaucheville, LA 71362 | $226,556 |
39 | Morein Farms | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $224,304 |
40 | G F & P Zaunbrecher Farm | Rayne, LA 70578 | $222,959 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”