Total Commodity Programs in Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 68,335
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Louisiana totaled $5,923,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Caldwell Bank And Trust Co | Columbia, LA 71418 | $6,962,871 |
42 | Angelina Plantation | Monterey, LA 71354 | $6,763,094 |
43 | Elm Tree Planting Co | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $6,737,061 |
44 | Mcdonald And Mcdonald | Newellton, LA 71357 | $6,717,840 |
45 | J & C Matt Partnership | Alexandria, LA 71303 | $6,673,572 |
46 | Ash More Farm Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $6,657,889 |
47 | First Guaranty Bank ** | Abbeville, LA 70511 | $6,467,281 |
48 | Powell & Newman Partnership | Newellton, LA 71357 | $6,422,529 |
49 | 3-b Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $6,370,825 |
50 | Barham Stevenson Co | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $6,358,592 |
51 | Five T | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $6,232,482 |
52 | Mize Farms | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $6,166,101 |
53 | Parker Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $6,141,273 |
54 | W-e Martin Farms | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $6,045,604 |
55 | Loewer Brothers | Eunice, LA 70535 | $5,966,933 |
56 | The Bank ** | Jennings, LA 70546 | $5,948,836 |
57 | Wild Farms | Midland, LA 70559 | $5,924,195 |
58 | Garber Farms | Iota, LA 70543 | $5,851,604 |
59 | Methvin Farms | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $5,803,707 |
60 | Red Gum Planting Co No 2 | Ferriday, LA 71334 | $5,768,830 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”