Loan Deficiency in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 490
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana totaled $8,779,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | A D Harrington | Iowa, LA 70647 | $8,833 |
122 | Floyd Harrington | Iowa, LA 70647 | $8,800 |
123 | Charles Patterson | Welsh, LA 70591 | $8,792 |
124 | Daniel Guillory | Bell City, LA 70630 | $8,608 |
125 | Rebecca B Schultz | Bell City, LA 70630 | $8,471 |
126 | Ray Hardy Estate | Iowa, LA 70647 | $8,370 |
127 | Patricia Daigle Mcneely | Lake Charles, LA 70605 | $8,171 |
128 | Charles H Mcneely Jr | Lake Charles, LA 70605 | $8,161 |
129 | Jp Farms LLC | Bell City, LA 70630 | $8,073 |
130 | Joe R Milsted Estate | Lake Charles, LA 70605 | $7,644 |
131 | E W Milsted Jr | Lake Charles, LA 70607 | $7,644 |
132 | Lowland Irrigation Inc | Iowa, LA 70647 | $7,453 |
133 | Mcneese State University Foundati | Lake Charles, LA 70609 | $7,392 |
134 | Clinton Nunez | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $7,222 |
135 | Gayle Properties Inc | Lake Charles, LA 70605 | $7,174 |
136 | Kenneth P Rauser | Sulphur, LA 70663 | $6,869 |
137 | Phillip W Rauser | Lake Charles, LA 70605 | $6,865 |
138 | Walter Henry Rauser | Rockville, MD 20853 | $6,861 |
139 | Kathryn R Veith | Fort Bragg, CA 95437 | $6,861 |
140 | Matthew Fruge Estate | Bell City, LA 70630 | $6,775 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”