Conservation Reserve Program in East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 134
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana totaled $4,395,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John S. Lanius | Baton Rouge, LA 70806 | $17,660 |
42 | Hawco Screens, Inc. | Slaughter, LA 70777 | $16,881 |
43 | Frances Ann R Harvey | Saint Francisville, LA 70775 | $16,581 |
44 | Mable B Hudgins | Baton Rouge, LA 70884 | $15,570 |
45 | Toler G Mc Cutcheon | Clinton, LA 70722 | $15,561 |
46 | Edna T Hatcher | Clinton, LA 70722 | $15,519 |
47 | Zach E. Hatcher | Clinton, LA 70722 | $15,519 |
48 | Mittie N Haynes | Norwood, LA 70761 | $15,507 |
49 | Elizabeth Stout | Baton Rouge, LA 70815 | $13,902 |
50 | Brenda Devalcourt | Norwood, LA 70761 | $13,328 |
51 | Sandy T Lantrip | Ethel, LA 70730 | $13,003 |
52 | Tullis Mc Knight | Baton Rouge, LA 70895 | $12,786 |
53 | Ellis Rogillio | Clinton, LA 70722 | $12,678 |
54 | Neil Record | Clinton, LA 70722 | $12,518 |
55 | Estate Of Joseph T Howell Sr | Ethel, LA 70730 | $12,118 |
56 | George V Berger | Baton Rouge, LA 70808 | $11,272 |
57 | Peggy Tabberer | Saint Francisville, LA 70775 | $11,153 |
58 | Jfh Lands II, LLC | Saint Francisville, LA 70775 | $10,633 |
59 | Idelee Holdings LLC | Ethel, LA 70730 | $9,554 |
60 | Gay B Mc Cutcheon | Clinton, LA 70722 | $8,757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”