Farm Subsidy information
East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana
Total Subsidies in East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 521
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana totaled $10,194,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | H D Morris | Ethel, LA 70730 | $101,027 |
22 | James Ford Harvey | Jackson, LA 70748 | $96,948 |
23 | Fighting Fillies L L C | Slaughter, LA 70777 | $95,373 |
24 | Charles W Smith | Jackson, LA 70748 | $94,357 |
25 | Faye Norwood | Norwood, LA 70761 | $91,310 |
26 | K-d Cattle Inc | Clinton, LA 70722 | $87,246 |
27 | John Lapenas Jr | Clinton, LA 70722 | $79,511 |
28 | A F Guttzeit Jr | Ethel, LA 70730 | $70,350 |
29 | Mrs Mary C Jordan | Saint Francisville, LA 70775 | $68,446 |
30 | Emerson Perkins | Norwood, LA 70761 | $68,439 |
31 | Donald H Phares | Clinton, LA 70722 | $56,300 |
32 | W F Kline Jr | Clinton, LA 70722 | $55,311 |
33 | Aucoin Timber LLC | Clinton, LA 70722 | $52,875 |
34 | Evans Logging Company LLC | Slaughter, LA 70777 | $52,875 |
35 | Lyman Fleniken Jr | Clinton, LA 70722 | $52,086 |
36 | Charles H Gardner | Slaughter, LA 70777 | $49,001 |
37 | K & M Enterprises Inc | Slaughter, LA 70777 | $48,839 |
38 | Jeff Peairs | Slaughter, LA 70777 | $48,786 |
39 | Lea E Hurst | Clinton, LA 70722 | $48,220 |
40 | Cliff Hurst | Clinton, LA 70722 | $47,618 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”