Deficiency Payment in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 952
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana totaled $13,472,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Morein Farms | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $224,304 |
2 | Charles & Conrad Bieber | Mamou, LA 70554 | $186,172 |
3 | Davis Ledoux II & Sons Partnership | Basile, LA 70515 | $184,701 |
4 | F & F Partnership | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $173,570 |
5 | Charles Veillon & Sons | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $125,762 |
6 | Fontenot & Cart Farms | Chataignier, LA 70524 | $123,300 |
7 | Soileau Brothers | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $121,950 |
8 | A & W Farms | Eunice, LA 70535 | $109,956 |
9 | Guidry Bros Farming Partnership | Oberlin, LA 70655 | $107,600 |
10 | Jackie Mcclelland And Son | Eunice, LA 70535 | $94,012 |
11 | J B Gus Miller Estate | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $93,539 |
12 | Percy J Fontenot Inc | Lafayette, LA 70598 | $91,214 |
13 | Leland D Vidrine | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $87,396 |
14 | J D Fontenot And Sons Fm Ptnshp | Eunice, LA 70535 | $84,296 |
15 | Jody David Fontenot | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $83,927 |
16 | Cynthia L Vidrine | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $83,415 |
17 | Bieber Farms Ltd | Mamou, LA 70554 | $83,213 |
18 | Wendell J Brunet | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $82,527 |
19 | David Chad West | Mamou, LA 70554 | $82,297 |
20 | Leslie Ardoin Inc | Lafayette, LA 70506 | $82,028 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>