Production Flexibility Program in Morehouse Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,067
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Morehouse Parish, Louisiana totaled $74,712,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larkin Plantation Farms | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $557,189 |
22 | Charles M Costello Farms | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $543,490 |
23 | Boyd Holley Farms | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $519,314 |
24 | Darin Pruitt Farms | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $508,320 |
25 | Mer Rouge Planting Ptn 2 | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $499,840 |
26 | N Woodard Mott Farms | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $498,784 |
27 | Neil Mott Farms | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $481,769 |
28 | Franklin Partnership | Rayville, LA 71269 | $467,556 |
29 | Shepard Planting Co | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $459,430 |
30 | Andy Barham Farms | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $458,852 |
31 | Mollicy Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $441,722 |
32 | M & H Farms | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $405,120 |
33 | New Ingleside Farming Co | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $400,368 |
34 | Mckoin Farms | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $391,148 |
35 | J Wallace Farms Ptn | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $378,344 |
36 | Moore Farm Partnership | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $373,292 |
37 | Dap Farms | Jones, LA 71250 | $362,918 |
38 | Swan Lake Planting Part | Bonita, LA 71223 | $361,109 |
39 | Sims Farms | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $357,876 |
40 | P & C Bunch Farms | Bastrop, LA 71221 | $348,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”