Farm Subsidy information
Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana
Total Subsidies in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 611
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana totaled $15,581,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Riverside Citrus Farms | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $142,752 |
22 | Joseph P Ranatza Jr | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $139,823 |
23 | C & M Cattle Ranch LLC | Port Sulphur, LA 70083 | $133,744 |
24 | Emile C Lagreco | Braithwaite, LA 70040 | $132,689 |
25 | Citrus Lands | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $131,911 |
26 | Nathan Sims | Buras, LA 70041 | $109,459 |
27 | John J Vogt III | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $107,454 |
28 | Leander J Taylor | Marrero, LA 70072 | $107,446 |
29 | Ted J Folse Cattle Co Inc | Raceland, LA 70394 | $101,326 |
30 | Charmion D Cosse | Port Sulphur, LA 70083 | $95,681 |
31 | Linda M Mcgough | New Orleans, LA 70116 | $86,132 |
32 | Ben Becnel | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $85,095 |
33 | Lynn Loga Armstrong | Boothville, LA 70038 | $85,047 |
34 | Currey Cattle Co Inc | Franklin, TN 37069 | $82,819 |
35 | Elkland Inc | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $82,526 |
36 | Morris Hart | Venice, LA 70091 | $82,033 |
37 | Kathleen C Buras | Port Sulphur, LA 70083 | $81,995 |
38 | Harold Folse Sr | Raceland, LA 70394 | $81,372 |
39 | Matthew L Armstrong | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $81,279 |
40 | Robin J Vogt | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $81,128 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”