Deficiency Payment in Saint James Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Saint James Parish, Louisiana totaled $53,704 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Uncle Sam Pltg Co Inc | Gramercy, LA 70052 | $11,300 |
2 | Welcome Pltn Inc | Saint James, LA 70086 | $8,326 |
3 | Schexnayder Farms Inc | Saint James, LA 70086 | $6,276 |
4 | Allee & Allen Farm LLC | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $5,067 |
5 | Gravois Farms LLC | Paulina, LA 70763 | $4,004 |
6 | Graugnard Pltg Inc | Saint James, LA 70086 | $2,872 |
7 | Hymel Farms Inc | Thibodaux, LA 70301 | $2,193 |
8 | Model Farm Co Inc | Convent, LA 70723 | $1,823 |
9 | Rodrigue Pltg Co Inc | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $1,660 |
10 | Bessie K Pltg Inc | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $1,645 |
11 | D & W Porta Inc | Gonzales, LA 70737 | $1,597 |
12 | Waguespack Farms Inc | Saint James, LA 70086 | $1,484 |
13 | Wilton Pltg Co Inc | Convent, LA 70723 | $1,326 |
14 | Murry Lebeouf & Son Farm | Saint James, LA 70086 | $1,094 |
15 | Trinity Sugar Farms Inc | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $919 |
16 | Crescent Farms Of Vacherie Inc | Thibodaux, LA 70301 | $571 |
17 | Marc Martin & Bros Inc | Paulina, LA 70763 | $547 |
18 | J B Falgoust Farm LLC | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $506 |
19 | Blackberry Farms LLC | Vacherie, LA 70090 | $339 |
20 | Caire & Graugnard LLC | Edgard, LA 70049 | $133 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>