Total Conservation Programs in Saint Martin Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 88
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saint Martin Parish, Louisiana totaled $287,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael Mowad | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $627 |
62 | Troy Latiolais | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $620 |
63 | Russel P Champagne | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $605 |
64 | Latiolais Sugarcane Farms LLC | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $541 |
65 | Howard Champagne Jr | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $531 |
66 | Warren Jones Jr | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $517 |
67 | Clyde Peltier | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $453 |
68 | Albert Bros | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $435 |
69 | Grady Pittman | Charlotte, NC 28205 | $403 |
70 | Nolan Duplantis | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $372 |
71 | Ailwood J Guidry | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $359 |
72 | Bryan Collette | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $353 |
73 | Robert Foti | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $351 |
74 | Edmond Judice | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $321 |
75 | Whitney Champagne | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $307 |
76 | Marie Louise Hebert | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $289 |
77 | Ralph Caillier Sr | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $281 |
78 | Sherman Carrier | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $250 |
79 | Roy Latiolais | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $186 |
80 | Connie Patin | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”