Counter Cyclical Program in Saint Martin Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 220
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Saint Martin Parish, Louisiana totaled $744,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Antoinette Debosier | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $516 |
82 | Christian Manning | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $515 |
83 | Nancy Manning | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $515 |
84 | Huey Dugas And Sons Inc | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $511 |
85 | Wanda S Ray | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $505 |
86 | Randy Duplantis | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $456 |
87 | Shirles Champagne | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $426 |
88 | Sugar Riot Farms Inc | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $385 |
89 | Edith Durand | St Martinville, LA 70582 | $385 |
90 | Levert-st John Farms Inc | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $378 |
91 | D & A Farms Inc | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $370 |
92 | Theriot Farms | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $319 |
93 | Laperouse Farms Inc | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $318 |
94 | Est Rita Y Olivier | Parks, LA 70582 | $316 |
95 | Laporte Inc | Arnaudville, LA 70512 | $315 |
96 | Eleanor F Ranzino | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $294 |
97 | Anna Stockstill | Lafayette, LA 70505 | $294 |
98 | Wade M Svendson | Baton Rouge, LA 70808 | $283 |
99 | Lawrence F Svendson | Baton Rouge, LA 70808 | $283 |
100 | Marie S Pribble | Baton Rouge, LA 70808 | $283 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”