Market Gains in Tensas Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 513
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Tensas Parish, Louisiana totaled $18,158,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Somerset Plantation | Newellton, LA 71357 | $172,327 |
22 | Joseph T III And Roxanne James | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $171,919 |
23 | Beeler Bayou Inc | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $158,931 |
24 | Tucker Farms | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $158,602 |
25 | James & Carolyn Arceneaux Farms | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $158,106 |
26 | Lavadas Crops LLC | Delhi, LA 71232 | $150,678 |
27 | Darron Jeffery Lee | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $146,468 |
28 | John Day Farms Partnership | Newellton, LA 71357 | $145,304 |
29 | K T Farms Partnership II | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $143,482 |
30 | Jimmy & Sandra White | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $140,090 |
31 | Panola Co | Newellton, LA 71357 | $136,451 |
32 | Maryland Plantation | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $135,416 |
33 | Robert & Cecilia Manning III | Ferriday, LA 71334 | $130,946 |
34 | Haring Farms | Wisner, LA 71378 | $129,515 |
35 | Crigler Planting | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $128,193 |
36 | Calvin Harold Rabb Jr Estate | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $126,947 |
37 | William Kyle Aymond | Wisner, LA 71378 | $124,250 |
38 | Darcey Aymond | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $124,250 |
39 | B And O Farms Partnership | Delhi, LA 71232 | $121,170 |
40 | James Craig Keyes | Newellton, LA 71357 | $118,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”