Cotton Ginning Program in Tensas Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 144
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Tensas Parish, Louisiana totaled $1,912,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kellon And Morgan Lee Irrevocable Trust-2011 | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,792 |
82 | John Sanderson | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $1,647 |
83 | Estate Of Girley Sanderson | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,562 |
84 | Burn Gin Co Inc | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $1,470 |
85 | Oakwood Plantation | Ferriday, LA 71334 | $1,462 |
86 | Gail Waters | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,293 |
87 | Cat Point Owners | Houston, TX 77024 | $1,285 |
88 | Aubrey Dale Magoun | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $1,259 |
89 | Louise T Magoun | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $1,259 |
90 | Blanche Farms LLC | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,250 |
91 | Theda W Collins | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,240 |
92 | Jennifer A Stanford Brown | Franklinton, LA 70438 | $1,231 |
93 | Edward Berry Jr | Abbeville, AL 36310 | $1,148 |
94 | Lee Kifer | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,136 |
95 | Connie Kifer | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,136 |
96 | Mary Sanderson Sanders | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,056 |
97 | Krauss Greenberg Louisiana LLC | New Orleans, LA 70124 | $972 |
98 | Bowden Lakewood LLC | Houston, TX 77065 | $968 |
99 | Frank M Eckard | Gilbert, LA 71336 | $941 |
100 | Canton Enterprises LLC | Prairieville, LA 70769 | $871 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”