Counter Cyclical Program in Tensas Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 872
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Tensas Parish, Louisiana totaled $67,395,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Beth Ann Vinson | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $137,463 |
102 | James Dale Vinson | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $137,451 |
103 | Steel Gang Farms Partnership | Newellton, LA 71357 | $137,412 |
104 | Lloyd Wyatt Dba Wyatt Farms | Newellton, LA 71357 | $134,911 |
105 | James Jim C Wilkerson | Newellton, LA 71357 | $129,219 |
106 | Toni M Perritt | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $128,382 |
107 | Charles D Merriett | Newellton, LA 71357 | $126,361 |
108 | High Hopes | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $125,980 |
109 | Tucker Farms | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $125,562 |
110 | Raymond Miller | Natchez, MS 39120 | $124,017 |
111 | James R Fortenberry Jr | Newellton, LA 71357 | $122,847 |
112 | James E Lancaster | Natchez, MS 39120 | $117,603 |
113 | Pat Beene | Auburn, KY 42206 | $116,960 |
114 | Jeane H Beene | Auburn, KY 42206 | $116,955 |
115 | Bryan Ashley | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $116,525 |
116 | Cottage Farm Lp | Jackson, TN 38305 | $116,018 |
117 | Richard & Brenda Mize | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $115,450 |
118 | Twin Stalks Inc | Rayville, LA 71269 | $112,728 |
119 | Russell Y Ratcliff Farms | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $111,562 |
120 | Helena Plantation | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $111,172 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”