Total Commodity Programs in Cumberland County, Maine, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 878
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cumberland County, Maine totaled $11,842,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jason M York Inc | Freeport, ME 04032 | $37,425 |
62 | Black Beauty, Inc. | Windham, ME 04062 | $37,086 |
63 | Bowen Lobster Co Inc | Freeport, ME 04032 | $36,782 |
64 | Captain B Lobster Company | Chebeague Island, ME 04017 | $35,756 |
65 | Nicholas Nieuwkerk | Arundel, ME 04046 | $35,599 |
66 | Glen S Perkins | Cape Neddick, ME 03902 | $35,443 |
67 | Henry Longbottom, LLC | Harpswell, ME 04079 | $35,213 |
68 | Sandy Lee Inc. | Harpswell, ME 04079 | $35,133 |
69 | Pine Point Charters Corp | Scarborough, ME 04070 | $35,123 |
70 | Scott Werner Lobster, LLC | Falmouth, ME 04105 | $34,807 |
71 | Michael C Cota Jr | Harpswell, ME 04079 | $34,358 |
72 | Martin Place Farm | Gorham, ME 04038 | $34,286 |
73 | Benjamin Perry | Cape Elizabeth, ME 04107 | $34,145 |
74 | Carl E Anderson | Orrs Island, ME 04066 | $33,350 |
75 | Adam Libby | Gorham, ME 04038 | $33,185 |
76 | Knight's Smiling Hill Farm | Westbrook, ME 04092 | $33,179 |
77 | Broadturn Farm Inc | Scarborough, ME 04074 | $33,088 |
78 | Gregory P Turner | Scarborough, ME 04074 | $32,958 |
79 | Maxwell's Inc | Cape Elizabeth, ME 04107 | $32,791 |
80 | Ryan Libby | Scarborough, ME 04074 | $32,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”