Farm Subsidy information
Cumberland County, Maine
Total Subsidies in Cumberland County, Maine, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,023
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cumberland County, Maine totaled $15,285,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thompson's Orchard | New Gloucester, ME 04260 | $36,276 |
82 | Captain B Lobster Company | Chebeague Island, ME 04017 | $35,756 |
83 | Nicholas Nieuwkerk | Arundel, ME 04046 | $35,599 |
84 | Glen S Perkins | Cape Neddick, ME 03902 | $35,443 |
85 | Henry Longbottom, LLC | Harpswell, ME 04079 | $35,213 |
86 | Sandy Lee Inc. | Harpswell, ME 04079 | $35,133 |
87 | Pine Point Charters Corp | Scarborough, ME 04070 | $35,123 |
88 | Scott Werner Lobster, LLC | Falmouth, ME 04105 | $34,807 |
89 | Juniper Genetics LLC | Gray, ME 04039 | $34,705 |
90 | Higmos Inc | Brunswick, ME 04011 | $34,685 |
91 | Knight's Smiling Hill Farm | Westbrook, ME 04092 | $34,403 |
92 | Michael C Cota Jr | Harpswell, ME 04079 | $34,358 |
93 | Benjamin Perry | Cape Elizabeth, ME 04107 | $34,145 |
94 | Daigle, C F & Son | Gorham, ME 04038 | $33,659 |
95 | Carl E Anderson | Orrs Island, ME 04066 | $33,350 |
96 | Adam Libby | Gorham, ME 04038 | $33,185 |
97 | Broadturn Farm Inc | Scarborough, ME 04074 | $33,088 |
98 | Gregory P Turner | Scarborough, ME 04074 | $32,958 |
99 | Maxwell's Inc | Cape Elizabeth, ME 04107 | $32,791 |
100 | Ryan Libby | Scarborough, ME 04074 | $32,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”