Total Commodity Programs in Hancock County, Maine, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,360
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hancock County, Maine totaled $19,341,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Elliott Jordan & Son Inc | Waltham, ME 04605 | $571,663 |
2 | Stewardship Gem, LLC | Trenton, ME 04605 | $183,934 |
3 | F/v Emma And Andrew, Inc. | Deer Isle, ME 04627 | $108,269 |
4 | Matthew Perez | Deer Isle, ME 04627 | $102,383 |
5 | Afphilbrook Inc | Bar Harbor, ME 04609 | $100,135 |
6 | Cranes Contract Cutting Inc | Lamoine, ME 04605 | $92,221 |
7 | F/v Fishin' W/ Jordyn, Inc. | Gouldsboro, ME 04607 | $91,328 |
8 | Fine Lines Lobster Inc | Bar Harbor, ME 04609 | $86,061 |
9 | Phippen's Lobster Inc | Bar Harbor, ME 04609 | $85,287 |
10 | Steve Philbrook Inc | Northeast Harbor, ME 04662 | $83,770 |
11 | Garrett Steele | Deer Isle, ME 04627 | $79,758 |
12 | Regardless Inc | Lamoine, ME 04605 | $78,692 |
13 | Josiah J Rhys | Deer Isle, ME 04627 | $73,098 |
14 | Peter Philbrook Incorporated | Southwest Harbor, ME 04679 | $72,032 |
15 | Mad Gaffer, Corp. | Bernard, ME 04612 | $71,371 |
16 | Michael Hutchinson | Stonington, ME 04681 | $70,149 |
17 | Andrew H Eaton | Deer Isle, ME 04627 | $68,753 |
18 | Obsession Inc | Sorrento, ME 04677 | $68,437 |
19 | Nathan A Jones | Stonington, ME 04681 | $67,611 |
20 | Bunker Harbor Lobster Corp. | Birch Harbor, ME 04613 | $66,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>