Total Commodity Programs in Somerset County, Maine, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 115
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Somerset County, Maine totaled $3,021,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Erabliere J.v. Inc. | Westbury, J0B 1 | $22,802 |
22 | Bedard Morissette Sugar Camp | Jackman, ME 04945 | $22,414 |
23 | Daniel E Lyman | Norridgewock, ME 04957 | $22,391 |
24 | Rodrigue Maple 1 Inc | Ste Justine, G0R 1 | $22,216 |
25 | Carrier Sugar Bush LLC | Levis, G6K 1 | $22,156 |
26 | 9109-1785 Quebec Inc | Saint-evariste, G0M 1 | $20,218 |
27 | James D Strout Jr | Cornville, ME 04976 | $19,206 |
28 | Dan E Mantor | Madison, ME 04950 | $17,577 |
29 | Bradley R Santy II | Skowhegan, ME 04976 | $17,001 |
30 | Renaud Giroux | Saint Zacharie, G0M 2 | $15,887 |
31 | Taylor Dairy Farm Corp | Saint Albans, ME 04971 | $15,605 |
32 | Alcide Giroux | Saint Prosper De Dor, G0M 1 | $14,885 |
33 | Benoit Giroux | Saint Prosper De Dor, G0M 1 | $14,885 |
34 | Carrier Sugar House Inc | Jackman, ME 04945 | $13,379 |
35 | Rpdm Sugar Camp, Inc | Jackman, ME 04945 | $11,649 |
36 | Germain Audet | Ste-justine, G0R 1 | $10,572 |
37 | Jean-claude Pare | St-zacharie, G0M 2 | $10,505 |
38 | Henry R Mellows | Anson, ME 04911 | $10,462 |
39 | Nathaniel D Brooks | Skowhegan, ME 04976 | $9,628 |
40 | Quwic Maple Syrup Farm Inc | Jackman, ME 04945 | $9,387 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”