Total Conservation Programs in Maryland, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,150
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Maryland totaled $10,570,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wood Brothers | Centreville, MD 21617 | $72,696 |
2 | Kent Family Farm LLC | Millington, MD 21651 | $62,928 |
3 | Lippy Brothers Farms St | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $50,105 |
4 | Springfield Farms Inc | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $50,000 |
5 | Price Valley Farm LLC | Warwick, MD 21912 | $50,000 |
6 | Oldfield Farms Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $50,000 |
7 | Emma Elizabeth Rickards Irrevocable Trust | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $50,000 |
8 | , | $49,894 | |
9 | Curtis Eberspacher | Cornelius, NC 28031 | $49,796 |
10 | Jonathan D Watters | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $47,178 |
11 | James E Baker | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $46,814 |
12 | Hollywood Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $46,697 |
13 | Chesapeake Wildlife Heritage | Chester, MD 21619 | $46,026 |
14 | Emily Jean Taylor | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $45,915 |
15 | Presquile Farms LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $45,850 |
16 | Estate Of Carolyn C Jones | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $45,243 |
17 | Anneliese Morris | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $45,195 |
18 | Dickinson Brothers | Linkwood, MD 21835 | $44,828 |
19 | James A Calderwood | Chevy Chase, MD 20815 | $44,585 |
20 | Kings Grant Farm Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $43,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>