Counter Cyclical Program in Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,174
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Maryland totaled $28,242,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Everett D Holland & Sons Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $65,657 |
42 | Dll Farms Inc | Centreville, MD 21617 | $63,881 |
43 | Sylvester Farms Inc | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $63,507 |
44 | Mac Farms Inc | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $63,505 |
45 | Rich Levels Grain Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $63,366 |
46 | Woodbury Farm Enter Inc | Queenstown, MD 21658 | $63,191 |
47 | Stephen T Pieper | White Hall, MD 21161 | $62,922 |
48 | Cecil Gannon & Sons Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $62,598 |
49 | Lester C Jones & Sons Inc | Massey, MD 21650 | $62,389 |
50 | Philip A Foster & Sons | Trappe, MD 21673 | $61,276 |
51 | Possum Hill Farms Inc | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $61,080 |
52 | Glad Mar Grain Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $60,669 |
53 | Trenton Mill Farms Inc | Upperco, MD 21155 | $60,640 |
54 | Swift Farms Inc | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $58,684 |
55 | Murray Brothers LLC | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $57,792 |
56 | Kennedy Farms | Trappe, MD 21673 | $56,628 |
57 | Richardson Farms Inc | Willards, MD 21874 | $56,352 |
58 | Charles T Bishop | Queenstown, MD 21658 | $56,014 |
59 | John Swaine III | Royal Oak, MD 21662 | $55,901 |
60 | Charles T Stanley And Son | Damascus, MD 20872 | $55,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”