Farm Subsidy information
Maryland
Total Subsidies in Maryland, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,714
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Maryland totaled $53,732,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Potomac View Farm LLC | Knoxville, MD 21758 | $59,069 |
82 | Martin R Bender | Grantsville, MD 21536 | $56,906 |
83 | Pryor Brothers | Hagerstown, MD 21740 | $56,670 |
84 | S G Tressler III | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $54,894 |
85 | Dell Ridge Farms Lllp | Oakland, MD 21550 | $54,670 |
86 | Grand View Farm LLC | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $54,584 |
87 | Alban Farms | Manchester, MD 21102 | $54,280 |
88 | Oaklane Farms | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | $53,595 |
89 | James E Baker | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $53,383 |
90 | F Kevin Leaverton | Centreville, MD 21617 | $52,814 |
91 | Michael R Valentine | Emmitsburg, MD 21727 | $52,593 |
92 | Lonely Willow Farms LLC | Smithsburg, MD 21783 | $50,943 |
93 | Evelyn Oaks | Clear Spring, MD 21722 | $50,149 |
94 | Lippy Brothers Farms St | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $50,105 |
95 | Springfield Farms Inc | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $50,000 |
96 | Price Valley Farm LLC | Warwick, MD 21912 | $50,000 |
97 | Oldfield Farms Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $50,000 |
98 | Emma Elizabeth Rickards Irrevocable Trust | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $50,000 |
99 | , | $49,894 | |
100 | Charles L Lethbridge | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $49,851 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”