Total Commodity Programs in Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 3,135
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Maryland totaled $40,780,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Charles T Jamison | Dickerson, MD 20842 | $73,601 |
122 | John Parker Smith | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $72,770 |
123 | Jones Agroventure Inc | Massey, MD 21650 | $71,679 |
124 | Roseda Beef LLC | Monkton, MD 21111 | $71,061 |
125 | Stadler Garden Centers Inc | Frederick, MD 21703 | $70,687 |
126 | Rocky Glade Farms Partnership | Woodsboro, MD 21798 | $70,482 |
127 | H Watson Powell Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $69,924 |
128 | Harold B Garner Jr | Welcome, MD 20693 | $69,484 |
129 | Cecil Gannon & Sons Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $69,426 |
130 | Mrs Janet S Fulton | Boonsboro, MD 21713 | $69,334 |
131 | Cove-run Farms LLC | Accident, MD 21520 | $69,287 |
132 | Christian Martin III | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | $68,950 |
133 | A Paul Eaton III | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $68,884 |
134 | Wil-o-mar Farms LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $68,315 |
135 | Ma & Pa Holstein/julie Yarrington | Street, MD 21154 | $68,259 |
136 | Gregory N Turner Farms LLC | Preston, MD 21655 | $68,206 |
137 | S G Tressler III | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $68,184 |
138 | Mark R Jones | Denton, MD 21629 | $67,961 |
139 | On Track Farming LLC | Galena, MD 21635 | $67,900 |
140 | Tull Farms Inc | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $67,450 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”