Farm Subsidy information
Caroline County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Caroline County, Maryland, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 115
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Caroline County, Maryland totaled $3,285,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brisk Wind Farm LLC | Denton, MD 21629 | $165,941 |
2 | Oakland View Farms LLC | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $129,290 |
3 | Robert N Taylor | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $91,220 |
4 | Ann P Marvin | Denton, MD 21629 | $29,490 |
5 | Robert J Meredith II | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $21,618 |
6 | Ridgely Hummingbird Farms Inc | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $19,860 |
7 | Catherine C Cherry Revocable Living Trust | Greensboro, MD 21639 | $18,197 |
8 | Ronald E Diem | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $15,712 |
9 | Roger F Adams Sr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $13,268 |
10 | Schuyler Benson | Oxford, MD 21654 | $12,622 |
11 | Richard K & Leona D Porter Trust | Greensboro, MD 21639 | $12,451 |
12 | Evelyn Keeler | Henderson, MD 21640 | $12,081 |
13 | Wesley Cohee | Preston, MD 21655 | $11,875 |
14 | James H Oross | Denton, MD 21629 | $11,514 |
15 | Robert Krueger | Bowie, MD 20715 | $10,696 |
16 | Weer Properties | Goldsboro, MD 21636 | $10,578 |
17 | Richard C Kinnamon | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $9,537 |
18 | Byard E Street | Preston, MD 21655 | $9,493 |
19 | Tr2 Uw Calvert C Merriken Jr | Denton, MD 21629 | $8,137 |
20 | Christian Jensen Md | Denton, MD 21629 | $7,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>