Total Disaster Programs in Carroll County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 446
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Carroll County, Maryland totaled $4,711,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Baugher Enterprises Inc | Westminster, MD 21158 | $243,301 |
2 | John D Myers Jr | Westminster, MD 21157 | $166,921 |
3 | Byron Stambaugh | Westminster, MD 21158 | $166,666 |
4 | Lease Brothers Inc | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $161,538 |
5 | Garvick's Farms Inc | Westminster, MD 21158 | $137,370 |
6 | Stanley E Culp | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $123,690 |
7 | Joseph A Schwartzbeck Jr | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $111,743 |
8 | Lawrence E Meeks | Westminster, MD 21158 | $110,036 |
9 | Brookside Farms Partnership | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $92,319 |
10 | Arters Mill Farms LLC | Westminster, MD 21158 | $90,567 |
11 | Tomorrow's Promise Inc | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $82,875 |
12 | Charles H Schaefer II | Westminster, MD 21158 | $79,785 |
13 | Arbaugh's Flowing Springs Inc | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $79,633 |
14 | Key De Blue Farm Inc | Keymar, MD 21757 | $75,558 |
15 | Blaine A Harman | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $73,978 |
16 | Thomas E Irwin Jr | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $69,062 |
17 | Lippy Bros Inc | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $66,721 |
18 | Roger W Tabler Sr | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $62,317 |
19 | James A Carmack | Keymar, MD 21757 | $61,194 |
20 | Fern Haines & Sons | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $56,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>