Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Carroll County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 201
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Carroll County, Maryland totaled $2,772,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roger B W Neal | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $38,567 |
22 | Roger W Tabler Sr | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $38,060 |
23 | Dell Bros III | Westminster, MD 21157 | $35,856 |
24 | Arthur Stocksdale III | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $35,685 |
25 | Stanley E Culp | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $34,991 |
26 | Rasche Bros Farms Inc | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $33,577 |
27 | Unicorn Associates Inc | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $32,698 |
28 | Leonard Miller | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $31,516 |
29 | John N Sussman | Westminster, MD 21157 | $28,443 |
30 | Mark A Gieron | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $26,421 |
31 | Frederick O Roelecke Jr | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $26,084 |
32 | Barry High | Westminster, MD 21157 | $24,103 |
33 | Clarence J Thomas | Keymar, MD 21757 | $22,381 |
34 | Kilfadda Corporation | Chambersburg, PA 17201 | $21,730 |
35 | Keith E Warner | Keymar, MD 21757 | $20,753 |
36 | Paul Doody Jr | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $20,629 |
37 | Steven Warehime | Hanover, PA 17331 | $18,973 |
38 | Donald Savage | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $18,405 |
39 | George Nelson Barnes Jr | Westminster, MD 21157 | $18,014 |
40 | Paul B Devilbiss | Keymar, MD 21757 | $17,779 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”