Farm Subsidy information
Carroll County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Carroll County, Maryland, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 259
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Carroll County, Maryland totaled $4,124,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Linda Rebert | Westminster, MD 21157 | $12,953 |
42 | Dennis J Harner | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $12,164 |
43 | John J Hayes Jr | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $11,947 |
44 | George L Tracey | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $11,318 |
45 | Helen J Burrier | Keymar, MD 21757 | $11,271 |
46 | Dells Generation Farms LLC | Manchester, MD 21102 | $11,100 |
47 | Margarets Fancy Homestead | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $10,860 |
48 | Baginsky Living Trust | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $10,618 |
49 | Philip Lee Watts Jr | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $10,483 |
50 | Carolyn B Krome Dba Persimmon Tree Farm | Westminster, MD 21157 | $10,144 |
51 | George Family LLC | Potomac, MD 20854 | $9,950 |
52 | Rasche Bros Farms Inc | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $9,934 |
53 | Phillip L Cole | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $9,870 |
54 | Rose Marie Glass | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $9,831 |
55 | Jason Tate | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $9,658 |
56 | , | $9,490 | |
57 | Juan J Morales | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $9,403 |
58 | James L Osborn | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $9,072 |
59 | John P Harrison Farm Services LLC | Woodbine, MD 21797 | $8,879 |
60 | Garnett Y Clark Jr | Westminster, MD 21157 | $7,730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”