Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Carroll County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 293
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Carroll County, Maryland totaled $959,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeffrey Miller | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $3,365 |
62 | Maryland Locust Crest Inc | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $3,286 |
63 | Steven K Stambaugh Jr | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $3,212 |
64 | Noah L Schaeffer | Westminster, MD 21157 | $3,208 |
65 | William R Fisher | Westminster, MD 21157 | $3,185 |
66 | Mark A Gieron | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $3,061 |
67 | Paul Doody Jr | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $2,969 |
68 | Michael A Speak | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $2,951 |
69 | Warren Kibler | Westminster, MD 21157 | $2,896 |
70 | Leaseview Farms LLC | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $2,760 |
71 | Tremper Brothers | Westminster, MD 21157 | $2,735 |
72 | Eric Burall | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $2,705 |
73 | Byron S Waggoner | East Berlin, PA 17316 | $2,656 |
74 | Dennis J Harner | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $2,652 |
75 | Jason Myers | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $2,573 |
76 | Thomas Walsh | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $2,546 |
77 | Jerome Bollinger | Sykesville, MD 21784 | $2,507 |
78 | Shane B Straitman | Westminster, MD 21158 | $2,499 |
79 | Arbaugh's Flowing Springs Inc | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $2,475 |
80 | Ernest C Martin | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $2,321 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”