Counter Cyclical Program in Cecil County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 159
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $1,180,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carroll Davis Dba Chestnut Lane Farm | Earleville, MD 21919 | $15,189 |
22 | Mackie Brothers Green Dale | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $14,799 |
23 | David P Davis III | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $14,744 |
24 | W W Jeanes Jr | Earleville, MD 21919 | $14,742 |
25 | Frank Joseph Muller II | Townsend, DE 19734 | $14,680 |
26 | George Clay & Sons Inc | Middletown, DE 19709 | $14,191 |
27 | Price Valley Farm LLC | Warwick, MD 21912 | $14,151 |
28 | Ronald E Miller | Earleville, MD 21919 | $13,329 |
29 | Wil-o-mar Farms LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $13,315 |
30 | Wilkinson Farms Inc | Landenberg, PA 19350 | $11,723 |
31 | William S Creeger | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $11,418 |
32 | Robert Dvorak | Elkton, MD 21921 | $11,326 |
33 | Long Green Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $11,255 |
34 | C Michael Scheeler | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $11,136 |
35 | Wm Fell | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $10,752 |
36 | David Meck | Saint Georges, DE 19733 | $10,520 |
37 | Bright Helmstone Farms Inc | Massey, MD 21650 | $10,116 |
38 | Mackie Bros | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $9,295 |
39 | Albeck Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $8,833 |
40 | Scott Sawyer | Warwick, MD 21912 | $8,746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”