Direct Payment Program in Cecil County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 233
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $7,330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William S Creeger | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $58,195 |
42 | Price Valley Farm LLC | Warwick, MD 21912 | $57,832 |
43 | Scott Sawyer | Warwick, MD 21912 | $53,097 |
44 | Sunny Ridge Farm | Gaithersburg, MD 20882 | $52,122 |
45 | Mason's Chrome View Limited | Nottingham, PA 19362 | $51,009 |
46 | Norman Astle Jr | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $48,149 |
47 | Robert J Dixon Jr | Earleville, MD 21919 | $47,452 |
48 | John W Dixon | Earleville, MD 21919 | $47,452 |
49 | Ewing Brothers LLC | Elkton, MD 21921 | $46,700 |
50 | Snow Hill Farm LLC | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $46,093 |
51 | Mackie Bros | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $42,519 |
52 | Curtis Carpenter Jr | Earleville, MD 21919 | $40,497 |
53 | David P Davis Jr | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $40,188 |
54 | William Pleasanton | Middletown, DE 19709 | $38,633 |
55 | Woodland- Revocable Hurtt | Williamsport, MD 21795 | $38,623 |
56 | Julian T Lockerman Jr | Earleville, MD 21919 | $36,106 |
57 | Randall Hutton Jr | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $35,430 |
58 | James Higgins | Port Deposit, MD 21904 | $34,884 |
59 | John A Zartler | Port Deposit, MD 21904 | $34,853 |
60 | Doris Strohmaier | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $34,491 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”