Conservation Reserve Program in Cecil County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 245
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $9,534,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ann G Stubbs | Elkton, MD 21921 | $41,883 |
62 | Ralph W Hooper | Earleville, MD 21919 | $41,537 |
63 | J David Reisler | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $41,369 |
64 | Wesley Brian Bristow Sr | Earleville, MD 21919 | $40,982 |
65 | Kenneth B Mcdonald Sr | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $40,624 |
66 | J B Carson Jr | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $39,122 |
67 | John T Cochran | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $38,818 |
68 | Randalia Farms Lc | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $38,419 |
69 | Carpenter Bros | Earleville, MD 21919 | $37,975 |
70 | Spry Brothers Inc | Elkton, MD 21921 | $36,724 |
71 | Betty W Mcdonald | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $35,521 |
72 | Peverley-silver LLC | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $35,174 |
73 | Dirk Meulenberg | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $34,750 |
74 | Mark Freese Sr | North East, MD 21901 | $34,062 |
75 | Darrell O Byerly | Warwick, MD 21912 | $33,365 |
76 | John R Howard | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $33,248 |
77 | Sodom Farm Lc | Warwick, MD 21912 | $32,333 |
78 | Brown M Roe III | Galena, MD 21635 | $31,955 |
79 | Douglas E Willard | Milford, DE 19963 | $31,931 |
80 | Palmarino Maccari | Elkton, MD 21921 | $31,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”