Total Conservation Programs in Cecil County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 336
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $10,999,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Emily M Manlove | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $51,016 |
62 | Caroline J Dupont Prickett | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $48,994 |
63 | Kenneth B Mcdonald Jr | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $46,994 |
64 | Jonathan J Osani | Conowingo, MD 21918 | $46,949 |
65 | Woodlands Coudon Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $46,501 |
66 | Walter Dudkewitz | Elkton, MD 21921 | $46,479 |
67 | Clyde Bell | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $46,270 |
68 | Eugene D Boyd | Earleville, MD 21919 | $45,858 |
69 | James Higgins | Port Deposit, MD 21904 | $45,140 |
70 | Ralph W Hooper | Earleville, MD 21919 | $45,037 |
71 | Alonzo G Decker Jr Estate | Baltimore, MD 21202 | $42,104 |
72 | Carpenter Bros | Earleville, MD 21919 | $42,071 |
73 | Ann G Stubbs | Elkton, MD 21921 | $41,883 |
74 | Charles S Moore | North East, MD 21901 | $41,572 |
75 | Thomas Dill | Warwick, MD 21912 | $41,529 |
76 | Darrell O Byerly | Warwick, MD 21912 | $41,297 |
77 | Wesley Brian Bristow Sr | Earleville, MD 21919 | $40,982 |
78 | Kenneth B Mcdonald Sr | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $40,624 |
79 | J B Carson Jr | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $39,122 |
80 | John T Cochran | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $38,818 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”