Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Cecil County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 119
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $1,565,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Swiss Dale Farms Inc | Port Deposit, MD 21904 | $2,329 |
82 | England Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $2,144 |
83 | William Clark Manlove II | Earleville, MD 21919 | $2,126 |
84 | John A Peoples Jr | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $2,126 |
85 | Susan L Peverley | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $2,059 |
86 | Christopher M Dodds | Elkton, MD 21921 | $2,040 |
87 | Heritage Hill Farm LLC | North East, MD 21901 | $2,004 |
88 | Danny Van Dyke | Port Deposit, MD 21904 | $1,984 |
89 | Billy J Van Dyke | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $1,984 |
90 | Louisa P Zeh | Warwick, MD 21912 | $1,732 |
91 | William Price V | Warwick, MD 21912 | $1,546 |
92 | Mccleary's Dairy | Elkton, MD 21921 | $1,420 |
93 | Price Investments Lp | Earleville, MD 21919 | $1,418 |
94 | Robert L Price | Middletown, DE 19709 | $1,391 |
95 | Kenneth D Dudkewitz | Elkton, MD 21921 | $1,373 |
96 | Farmington Acres LLC | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $1,353 |
97 | Howard Birney | North East, MD 21901 | $1,286 |
98 | Levi Z Riehl | Earleville, MD 21919 | $1,188 |
99 | Benuel King | Earleville, MD 21919 | $1,160 |
100 | England Family Farm | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $1,141 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”