Total Conservation Programs in Cecil County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 336
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $10,999,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Catholic Diocese Foundation | Wilmington, DE 19899 | $29,214 |
102 | Wayne K Bartsch | Warwick, MD 21912 | $28,451 |
103 | Herring Creek Farm Lc | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $27,560 |
104 | Francis Otenasek | Earleville, MD 21919 | $27,408 |
105 | Edith Dvorak | Elkton, MD 21921 | $27,403 |
106 | Wayne Brown | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $27,374 |
107 | Jeanne Wright Estate | Earleville, MD 21919 | $27,273 |
108 | Phillip W Sigman | Warwick, MD 21912 | $27,243 |
109 | Pleasant View Farms | North East, MD 21901 | $27,226 |
110 | David A Jefferies | Warwick, MD 21912 | $26,916 |
111 | John F Belgrade | Wilmington, DE 19803 | $26,854 |
112 | Warburton Farm LLC | Elkton, MD 21921 | $26,724 |
113 | 600 Bouchelle Road LLC | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $26,192 |
114 | Middlesex Farms | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $25,274 |
115 | Elizabeth B Eldreth | Conowingo, MD 21918 | $24,442 |
116 | Stephen Whitney Isaacson | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $24,300 |
117 | Patrick P Pleasanton | Warwick, MD 21912 | $24,014 |
118 | Vito Papagno | Elkton, MD 21922 | $23,920 |
119 | Frederick Williams Jr | Warwick, MD 21912 | $23,858 |
120 | Michael W Dickinson | North East, MD 21901 | $23,651 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”