Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Cecil County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 77
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $63,936 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David P Davis III | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $940 |
22 | Long View Farms Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $620 |
23 | Christopher J Price | Earleville, MD 21919 | $611 |
24 | John Bryan Manlove | Warwick, MD 21912 | $601 |
25 | William S Creeger | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $574 |
26 | William Clark Manlove II | Earleville, MD 21919 | $561 |
27 | Country Heritage Partnership | Worton, MD 21678 | $553 |
28 | Kilby Farms LLC | Colora, MD 21917 | $552 |
29 | Ewing Brothers LLC | Elkton, MD 21921 | $463 |
30 | Ronald Underwood | North East, MD 21901 | $453 |
31 | Mason's Chrome View Limited | Nottingham, PA 19362 | $435 |
32 | Warren D Strohmaier | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $405 |
33 | Heritage Hill Farm LLC | North East, MD 21901 | $360 |
34 | David P Davis Jr | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $335 |
35 | Staff-herd Farms | Elkton, MD 21921 | $312 |
36 | Long Green Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $307 |
37 | C Michael Kincaid | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $297 |
38 | Albeck Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $273 |
39 | Patrick P Pleasanton | Warwick, MD 21912 | $247 |
40 | Matthew Bartsch | Earleville, MD 21919 | $246 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”