Total Disaster Programs in Charles County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 118
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Charles County, Maryland totaled $2,028,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Roy F Daugherty Jr | Nanjemoy, MD 20662 | $11,082 |
42 | Michael C Granados | Huntingtown, MD 20639 | $10,427 |
43 | Ernest Patrick Gardiner | Waldorf, MD 20601 | $9,428 |
44 | Susan Ann Cole | Indian Head, MD 20640 | $8,908 |
45 | Stephen F Hales | Bel Alton, MD 20611 | $6,441 |
46 | Carl Russell Steinhauser | Newburg, MD 20664 | $5,771 |
47 | H & S Farms LLC | Hughesville, MD 20637 | $5,682 |
48 | J Michael Stonestreet | Hughesville, MD 20637 | $5,652 |
49 | Francis Radcliff Jr | La Plata, MD 20646 | $5,600 |
50 | Maurice L Stonestreet | Bryantown, MD 20617 | $5,505 |
51 | Benjamin A Welch | Charlotte Hall, MD 20622 | $5,198 |
52 | John N Forbes | Charlotte Hall, MD 20622 | $4,601 |
53 | Frances E Gardiner | Nanjemoy, MD 20662 | $4,319 |
54 | Victoria Cook | La Plata, MD 20646 | $4,315 |
55 | J Warren Jameson Jr | Bryantown, MD 20617 | $4,122 |
56 | Thomas L Hoffman Sr | Waldorf, MD 20601 | $4,113 |
57 | Friendly Hall Farm, LLC | Mechanicsville, MD 20659 | $4,028 |
58 | Rice Farms LLC | Faulkner, MD 20632 | $3,677 |
59 | Clark B Bowling | Faulkner, MD 20632 | $3,091 |
60 | Elizabeth L Bowling | Faulkner, MD 20632 | $2,886 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”