Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Charles County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 51
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Charles County, Maryland totaled $167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | George Robert Abell | Indian Head, MD 20640 | $2,429 |
22 | Rice Farms LLC | Faulkner, MD 20632 | $2,376 |
23 | Mickey Charles Rice | Newburg, MD 20664 | $2,358 |
24 | Zekiah Farms3,llc | Bryantown, MD 20617 | $1,940 |
25 | Mary E Boswell | Indian Head, MD 20640 | $1,918 |
26 | Robert F Stahl Jr | Hughesville, MD 20637 | $1,741 |
27 | Gilbert O Bowling Jr | Charlotte Hall, MD 20622 | $1,709 |
28 | Russell L Shlagel | Waldorf, MD 20601 | $1,669 |
29 | Thomas M Middleton | Waldorf, MD 20601 | $1,596 |
30 | Judy Campbell | Marbury, MD 20658 | $1,307 |
31 | Thomas Stonestreet | Charlotte Hall, MD 20622 | $1,092 |
32 | Donald Stonestreet | Charlotte Hall, MD 20622 | $1,052 |
33 | William W Tomlinson | Indian Head, MD 20640 | $1,021 |
34 | Clark B Bowling | Faulkner, MD 20632 | $895 |
35 | Robert A Boarman | Newburg, MD 20664 | $751 |
36 | Jeffery W Earnshaw Jr | La Plata, MD 20646 | $730 |
37 | Jeanne Herbert Williams | Faulkner, MD 20632 | $685 |
38 | Kenneth A Turner Jr | Newburg, MD 20664 | $636 |
39 | Michael F Mona | La Plata, MD 20646 | $548 |
40 | Amy Bowling | Port Tobacco, MD 20677 | $528 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”