Total Conservation Programs in Dorchester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 711
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Dorchester County, Maryland totaled $33,273,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ralph W Jackson III | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $130,462 |
62 | Sand Hill Farms | Secretary, MD 21664 | $127,536 |
63 | Frances Peters | Beltsville, MD 20705 | $125,407 |
64 | R & J Reid Farms LLC | Seaford, DE 19973 | $123,815 |
65 | Theresa M Melnikas | North Andover, MA 01845 | $123,476 |
66 | Brett W Travers | East New Market, MD 21631 | $123,373 |
67 | Charles Beckwith | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $121,460 |
68 | Cornelia J Edmondson Trust | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $121,295 |
69 | William F Outten Jr | Vienna, MD 21869 | $120,700 |
70 | Elmer E Hearn | Seaford, DE 19973 | $120,139 |
71 | Joseph Katcef Credit Shelter Trus | Annapolis, MD 21403 | $117,944 |
72 | D'adamo Family Limited Partnershi | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $115,945 |
73 | The Josiah F Linthicum Irrevocabl | Auburn, CA 95603 | $115,347 |
74 | Frederick C Pomeroy | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $115,081 |
75 | Wilfred Lawson Trust | Virginia Beach, VA 23454 | $114,802 |
76 | Mary S Fogarty | Los Angeles, CA 90068 | $112,353 |
77 | W A Harper & Son | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $108,831 |
78 | Norman A Mills Jr | East New Market, MD 21631 | $106,501 |
79 | Reid Farms Inc | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $106,359 |
80 | Philip W Spedden Jr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $105,742 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”