Total Commodity Programs in Dorchester County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 223
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dorchester County, Maryland totaled $1,822,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Emily's Produce LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $8,919 |
62 | George W Weber & Sons Inc | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $8,732 |
63 | Michael A Knauer | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $8,560 |
64 | J L Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $8,273 |
65 | George R Nagel | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $8,245 |
66 | Pine Haven Farms | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $7,289 |
67 | Bruce J Twilley | Secretary, MD 21664 | $7,201 |
68 | Balvin Brinsfield III | Vienna, MD 21869 | $7,056 |
69 | Douglas D Scott | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $6,961 |
70 | Green Meadows Family Farm LLC | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $6,822 |
71 | Warwick Crest Farm | East New Market, MD 21631 | $6,152 |
72 | Donald L Cheesman Sr | East New Market, MD 21631 | $6,085 |
73 | Jaye Hastings | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $5,851 |
74 | Harold Travers | Madison, MD 21648 | $5,764 |
75 | Brinsfield Lowe | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $5,745 |
76 | Richfield Farms LLC | East New Market, MD 21631 | $5,066 |
77 | Russell Sage Baker Iv | Quantico, MD 21856 | $4,979 |
78 | J Edward Powell | East New Market, MD 21631 | $4,955 |
79 | John R Trice III | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $4,934 |
80 | H James Watson | East New Market, MD 21631 | $4,833 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”