Conservation Reserve Program in Frederick County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 392
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Frederick County, Maryland totaled $16,765,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Karl Pryor | Emmitsburg, MD 21727 | $18,626 |
202 | Daniel R Miller | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $18,541 |
203 | James A Arnold | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $18,531 |
204 | Frances Diane Moser | Myersville, MD 21773 | $18,481 |
205 | Ronald Krom | Rocky Ridge, MD 21778 | $18,276 |
206 | Elizabeth Brown | Rocky Ridge, MD 21778 | $18,227 |
207 | Md Sheriffs-youth Ranch | Frederick, MD 21704 | $18,025 |
208 | William Joseph Allen III | Jefferson, MD 21755 | $17,818 |
209 | Horsey Farm LLC | Jefferson, MD 21755 | $17,781 |
210 | David H Bowers | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $17,741 |
211 | Jean E Keilholtz Revocable Living | The Villages, FL 32163 | $17,316 |
212 | Paul A Kendall | Kensington, MD 20895 | $17,213 |
213 | Robert J Kline | Thurmont, MD 21788 | $17,105 |
214 | Grace M Moser | Myersville, MD 21773 | $16,788 |
215 | Estate Of David N Klein Sr | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $16,762 |
216 | John Wilbur | Frederick, MD 21703 | $16,450 |
217 | Robert S Shoemaker | Walkersville, MD 21793 | $16,052 |
218 | Connie Beth Wetzel | Walkersville, MD 21793 | $15,970 |
219 | Earl H Schroyer | Keymar, MD 21757 | $15,924 |
220 | Eric Maiwald | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $15,745 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”