Emergency Conservation Program in Frederick County, Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 63
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Frederick County, Maryland totaled $292,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dean E Considine | Middletown, MD 21769 | $2,370 |
42 | W Dwight Repp | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $2,248 |
43 | Ernest S Christian | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $2,248 |
44 | Dennis J Ramsburg | Walkersville, MD 21793 | $2,218 |
45 | Pamela H. Moser Dba Walnut Ridge Farm II | Middletown, MD 21769 | $2,088 |
46 | Walnut Ridge Farm | Middletown, MD 21769 | $1,915 |
47 | Haines Brothers | Middletown, MD 21769 | $1,831 |
48 | Lorelle Zimmerman | Walkersville, MD 21701 | $1,831 |
49 | Charles P Bosmajian Deleted | Emmitsburg, MD 21727 | $1,819 |
50 | Rocky Point Farms Inc | Tuscarora, MD 21790 | $1,565 |
51 | Amos R Keller Jr Estate | Middletown, MD 21769 | $1,499 |
52 | James T Keilholtz | Emmitsburg, MD 21727 | $1,268 |
53 | Richard L Arnold | Middletown, MD 21769 | $1,234 |
54 | Paul E Spurrier | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $1,146 |
55 | Heflin Bros Inc | Woodsboro, MD 21798 | $1,140 |
56 | Mark A Lewis | Myersville, MD 21773 | $1,102 |
57 | Marsha Arneson | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $1,066 |
58 | Fred Keister | Fort Loudon, PA 17224 | $925 |
59 | Lee E Miller Dvm | Woodsboro, MD 21798 | $910 |
60 | Little River Ranch Inc | Thurmont, MD 21788 | $905 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”