Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Frederick County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 305
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Frederick County, Maryland totaled $3,672,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Geisinger Farms LLC | Middletown, MD 21769 | $149,783 |
2 | Oak Bluff Farms LLC | Woodsboro, MD 21798 | $141,688 |
3 | Keith Edward Mercer | Frederick, MD 21701 | $85,291 |
4 | Glenn Eaves Jr | Rocky Ridge, MD 21778 | $82,551 |
5 | Grossnickle Farms Inc | Walkersville, MD 21793 | $75,420 |
6 | Michael D Gaver | New Market, MD 21774 | $63,552 |
7 | Snow Hill Dairy Ltd | Frederick, MD 21704 | $60,934 |
8 | James C Boyer | Middletown, MD 21769 | $59,267 |
9 | John H Wright Jr | Middletown, MD 21769 | $59,082 |
10 | Meleah Wright | Middletown, MD 21769 | $59,082 |
11 | Tranco Farms Inc | Leesburg, VA 20175 | $50,960 |
12 | Matthew E Toms | Walkersville, MD 21793 | $49,984 |
13 | Vaughn J Harshman | Frederick, MD 21703 | $49,523 |
14 | Tuscarora Farms LLC | Tuscarora, MD 21790 | $48,518 |
15 | Harold L Beall | Monrovia, MD 21770 | $48,258 |
16 | Randy Sowers | Middletown, MD 21769 | $47,565 |
17 | Venture & Luck Farms | Walkersville, MD 21793 | $47,377 |
18 | Pine Hill Farms Inc | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $46,809 |
19 | Tulip-pond Farm | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $44,264 |
20 | Rocky Point Farms Inc | Tuscarora, MD 21790 | $43,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>