Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Harford County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 90
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $2,782,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James W Galbreath | Street, MD 21154 | $14,559 |
42 | Katharine Umbarger-dallam | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $14,445 |
43 | Milton W Martin | Street, MD 21154 | $13,777 |
44 | Quietness Farm LLC | White Hall, MD 21161 | $12,559 |
45 | Douglas H Smith Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $12,040 |
46 | Jonathan P Ruff | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $11,025 |
47 | Benjamin Roy Lowe | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $10,458 |
48 | Roy L Testerman | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $10,371 |
49 | Robert K Evans | Delta, PA 17314 | $8,571 |
50 | Lyons Farm | Churchville, MD 21028 | $7,976 |
51 | David Button | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $7,882 |
52 | William C Wernig | Street, MD 21154 | $7,803 |
53 | George C Reeves | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $7,516 |
54 | B Stephen Mcelwain | White Hall, MD 21161 | $7,428 |
55 | Ernest R Mcelwain | White Hall, MD 21161 | $7,255 |
56 | W Gene Umbarger | Churchville, MD 21028 | $7,196 |
57 | Daily Crisis Farm Ltd | White Hall, MD 21161 | $7,184 |
58 | David E Stewart | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $5,907 |
59 | Kimberly Archer Lewis | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $5,888 |
60 | Philip A Waltimyer | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $5,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”