Farm Subsidy information
Harford County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Harford County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 174
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $2,760,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William T Harrison | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $4,746 |
62 | Roy L Testerman | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $4,692 |
63 | Alan R Burdette Jr | Aberdeen, MD 21001 | $4,646 |
64 | James P Knight | Airville, PA 17302 | $4,534 |
65 | Carl William Nash Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $4,513 |
66 | Gallion's Farm | Havre De Grace, MD 21078 | $4,478 |
67 | Jonathan P Ruff | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $4,466 |
68 | Laurence M Johnson | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $4,413 |
69 | James B Reeves Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $4,312 |
70 | Garden Fence Farm LLC | Street, MD 21154 | $4,288 |
71 | Jonathan D Mcguirk | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $4,206 |
72 | Daily Crisis Farm Ltd | White Hall, MD 21161 | $3,922 |
73 | Barbara W Lowe | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $3,889 |
74 | Steven H Graefe | Street, MD 21154 | $3,878 |
75 | Benjamin Roy Lowe | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $3,646 |
76 | Thomas P Ensor | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $3,483 |
77 | Woolsey Farm Lamb LLC | Churchville, MD 21028 | $3,436 |
78 | B Stephen Mcelwain | White Hall, MD 21161 | $3,364 |
79 | W Gene Umbarger | Churchville, MD 21028 | $3,235 |
80 | Hartland Valley Simmentals LLC | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $3,202 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”