Total Commodity Programs in Harford County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 384
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $33,344,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | J Robert Tibbs Jr | Havre De Grace, MD 21078 | $93,994 |
82 | Gregory D Stewart | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $93,860 |
83 | Don-able Farms Inc | Street, MD 21154 | $92,810 |
84 | Indian Spring Farm LLC | Darlington, MD 21034 | $92,616 |
85 | Aldino Sod Farms Inc | Churchville, MD 21028 | $92,053 |
86 | James C Smith Jr | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $91,363 |
87 | Robert J Kelly III | Darlington, MD 21034 | $88,383 |
88 | Sunnyside Farms | White Hall, MD 21161 | $85,368 |
89 | Donald S Stubbs Estate | Street, MD 21154 | $85,031 |
90 | Roy G Elliott Estate | Darlington, MD 21034 | $84,162 |
91 | Daniel F Vaughan | White Hall, MD 21161 | $83,844 |
92 | George C Reeves Farm | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $83,544 |
93 | Star Rock Services | Conestoga, PA 17516 | $82,672 |
94 | Snake Lane LLC | Churchville, MD 21028 | $80,640 |
95 | Daily Crisis Farm Ltd | White Hall, MD 21161 | $78,883 |
96 | Charles L Pieper Jr | White Hall, MD 21161 | $76,116 |
97 | E Hayes Gardiner | Bel Air, MD 21014 | $75,380 |
98 | W Gene Umbarger | Churchville, MD 21028 | $73,120 |
99 | Fair Haven Farm Ptr | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $71,759 |
100 | Jonathan D Mcguirk | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $70,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”