Farm Subsidy information
Harford County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Harford County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 610
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $50,410,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Douglas H Smith Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $240,002 |
42 | Mack C Moxley Jr | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $218,268 |
43 | Piedmont Ridge Enterprises LLC | White Hall, MD 21161 | $216,742 |
44 | David M Keyes | Aberdeen, MD 21001 | $212,646 |
45 | Twin Pine Farms No | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $212,644 |
46 | John Magness | Joppa, MD 21085 | $201,582 |
47 | Kimberly P Moore | Churchville, MD 21028 | $197,857 |
48 | Maroamo Farms Ptr | Street, MD 21154 | $191,788 |
49 | Daniel T Magness | White Hall, MD 21161 | $189,800 |
50 | Quietness Farm LLC | White Hall, MD 21161 | $179,386 |
51 | Mt Felix Farm | Aberdeen, MD 21001 | $175,870 |
52 | Dougherty Farms LLC | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $170,639 |
53 | Brad's Produce LLC | Churchville, MD 21028 | $170,047 |
54 | G Roy Joines | White Hall, MD 21161 | $168,751 |
55 | Jonathan D Mcguirk | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $168,396 |
56 | Mcguirk Brothers LLC | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $167,101 |
57 | Crowl Bros Inc | Street, MD 21154 | $165,116 |
58 | John S Ball | Churchville, MD 21028 | $158,182 |
59 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $153,725 |
60 | Milton W Martin | Street, MD 21154 | $150,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”